ever since i left the city you!!!
new post coming soon??
new post coming soon??
I’m not over it.
Or so that’s what Jackie claimed. We were walking home from the bar earlier this spring and she brought up the subject more or less out of the blue. I suppose I’d have preferred she at least pretend to ask if I was or was not over The Ex. But she didn’t. She stated a conclusion – she wasn’t looking to test a hypothesis.
Our footfalls were like ellipses dot dot dot-ing through a brief, charged silence. Although she hadn’t posed a question, what she said demanded a response. To deflect her accusation I’d need to carefully choose my words. A blanket denial wouldn’t be credible, while freely spilling my broken heart’s contents all over the pavement wasn’t going to help me win her affection.
I’d been here with other women before. These discussions never go well. The women I’ve dated tend to consider signs of grief over a past relationship as one of the most richly crimson-hued of red flags. By the time Jackie brought it up, I’d already learned my lesson many times over that I ought to avoid the subject of The Ex at all costs, at all times. Everyone knows it’s a bad idea to speak of exes with bitterness or resentment, but I’d already discovered the hard way that you shouldn’t display even a hint of any residual emotional attachment – not a whit of wistfulness.
It’s a strange fiction to maintain.
After taking a pause to measure my reply to Jackie, I sputtered out something along the lines of: “sure, you’re probably right that I still feel sad about [The Ex], but my heart is open to finding someone new, and it’s been a long time, and if I’m still sad about [The Ex] it’s mostly because I haven’t been able to establish anything deep and lasting with anyone else since,” blah, blah, etc. It didn’t persuade her. It never persuades anyone.
Someone to come home to
Like all online dating sites, OkCupid claims they’ve figured out how to create order out of chaos and match its users up with compatible prospects. Their primary mechanism is to prompt their users to answer lots of questions. Some are inconsequential: “Would you buy your partner perfume or cologne as a gift?” “If your own toothbrush was not available, would you feel comfortable using a partner’s toothbrush?” Some are political: “Is it logically inconsistent to support the death penalty but oppose abortion?” “Do you think the government has the right to regulate the ownership and use of weapons?” Still others are aggressively invasive: “Suppose you’re dating someone who seems to have long-term potential. You discover that they want to urinate on you during sex. Would you consider staying with this person?”
Log on to my profile to see how I answered that one, folks!
OkCupid uses your answers to calculate compatibility, but everyone can also view each other’s answers. You know, so you can figure out whether the dude who posted four mirror selfies of his abs considers himself a radical feminist, a liberal feminist, an “other” feminist, or none of the above.
Here’s the particular question I wanna talk about: “Which of these options most closely describes what you’re looking for in your next relationship?” The answers you can choose are “someone to come home to,” “someone to go out with,” and “someone for tonight.”
The site promises you better matches if you answer more questions, and while that claim strikes me as pretty dubious now, I took their word on it when I joined at the end of 2012. I answered 200-300 of OkCupid’s questions in my first few weeks on the site.
And so in that first flush of excitement when I began online dating and it was working and attractive, intelligent women were, to my surprise, responding to my advances, I came across the question and I clicked “someone to come home to” without hesitation.
Since then I’ve looked at countless profiles and I’ve found that no one else, and I mean nobody, answers “someone to come home to.”
But of course it’s not like she wasn’t on to something
A week before I knew Jackie existed, and 11 days before we went on a first date, I wrote an email:
from: me <me@gmail.com>
to: the ex <theex@gmail.com>
date: Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:17 AM
subject:
Hi,
I’m writing you because I’ve been thinking about you. Not in a strolling-merrily-along-under-a-blue-sky-in-the-cool-autumn-air-being-struck-with-the-thought-of-oh-how-is-this-person-doing-I-haven’t-given-her-a-thought-in-so-very-a-long-time kind of way, but rather in a more or less continual way for the last two years.
I’m know there’s definitely a chance that I in no way occupy the same kind of footprint in your consciousness that you occupy in mine – the risk I ran, I suppose, when I casually bandied about hurtful, vain threats of “eternal sunshining” someone who cared about me. But I trust that you’ll be kind enough to read this letter, even if it doesn’t resonate very much. I’m prepared for it not to; indeed, I have to expect that it won’t.
There’s several things I want to express. I have changed in many ways over the last two years – in ways both superficial and deeply essential. On the more superficial end of things, I acknowledge a lot of personal failures on my part – failures that would have been relatively simple for me to address had I had the necessary wisdom (or more pointedly, the generosity and other-directedness). There’s the obvious ridiculously basic stuff like not exploiting you as my personal maid, and not inflicting hours and hours of video gaming upon you.
I haven’t played a video game to speak of since we broke up. I’ve also learned that keeping a tidy house is its own virtue – it just feels better. And it’s trivially easy to not strew my filthy clothes everywhere, and to run the damn dishwasher myself.
But trust me when I say I believe/understand there was much more to it than that.
I cringe inside every time “Not Fair” by Lily Allen comes up on shuffle. I was a selfish, ungiving, and uncommunicative sexual partner. I also looked physically slovenly in many ways at the end of our relationship – another manifestation of how much I took you for granted in the most literal sense of foregoing all effort to respect, affirm, and provide for a partner’s needs because I didn’t feel any real drive or motivation to keep you respected, affirmed, and provided for.
To this day on command I can make my heart sink deeply in my chest – like, feel actual literal chest pain – when I remember back to me sitting out in a dark, TV-blue-lit living room while you would repeatedly ask me to come to bed throughout the night.
I don’t intend for these recitations to be a way of pointing at myself as if to say “ATTN: I’VE ADDRESSED ALL MY ISSUES! YOU CAN TAKE ME BACK NOW! PLEASE!” Really, I don’t. Beyond my shortcomings that drove you away, you have your own life path of discovery and desire you’re on and I can conceive and understand that perhaps you just felt you’d gotten everything out of your involvement with me that there was to get and that it was time to experience new people in life and for all I know you’ve never once looked back.
I just want you to know that I empathize with the position I put you in at the end of our relationship. My email earlier this summer was intended to be in the same vein – even though I recognize in retrospect that ending an email with “I am not angry with you” could come off as presumptuous (“Oh, gee, thanks, I’m glad you’ve made that magnanimous pronouncement, oh forgiving one”). I didn’t mean that previous email to be a gesture of kindness on my part either – I meant it to be like, hey, I’ve now been on the other end of rejecting someone who wants dearly to be with me and I can identify with the many ways in which that side of things can be goddamn hurtful as well.
Because I’ve been on that side – the side of the one who wants to end things – I get that after a certain point your heart can go out to someone for any sadness or anguish that they feel over you but that sometimes it really just won’t change anything. So let that be part of my preface here, and I apologize for the heart ache (if any) that what’s below will cause you.
I miss you.
I have, with great thought and deliberateness, oriented most aspects of my life toward moving on from, transcending, or getting over the wrenching transition is entailed in losing someone who was as much an integral and big part of my life as you were. I spend a great deal of psychic energy trying to philosophically recalibrate my dependence upon romantic fulfillment as a source of joy, trying to achieve a sense of equanimity toward the loss of you and the risk of loss of future partners and striking a proper balance between detachment and total alienation, and I try very very hard to think critically about the pleasures I pursue – sexual, sensual (food, intoxication), ego-driven aspirations and vanity. All of those are transient and ultimately not real and I haven’t transcended those desires, but I think a lot about my relationship to them and how to stay engaged in the world without losing my mind in wild, senseless pursuit of pleasure.
As you know, I have waded into the dating world with wild abandon, meeting women at a relentless, frantic pace. It hasn’t worked. I mean, it’s worked to meet women and to fill up time and to have mediocre, emotionally empty sex. But I have found no joy in it and I have never come close to establishing anything approaching the kind of true emotional intimacy I remember feeling like I had with you. I have gone out with so many different women that what at first seemed like a hasty conclusion is now looming over me: I might not find that emotional intimacy again. I certainly haven’t found anyone with your incredible intellectual vitality, either, and I’ve found very few that share your thoroughgoing, rigorous commitment to principles of equality and social justice. And to top it off I haven’t found many women that I’m attracted to like I am to you.
None of this stuff is your problem and I’m not writing it to evoke pity. But follow along with me for just a few more paragraphs, if you would..
You’re a black box to me, by my own design. Since our breakup I have not looked at your facebook profile, I haven’t looked at your twitter account, I haven’t so much as googled your name. Your number is not in my phone, though one of life’s ironic twists is that for all the time we dated I never had it memorized, and now I can’t unmemorize it or make myself unknow it. At first it was part of an immature attempt to so-called “eternal sunshine” you – but as the months and years have gone on it’s just been self-preservation because I know there’s a very substantial chance that spending time gazing upon your life from afar would still seriously hurt.
. . .
When you were driving me to the . . . airport on my brief final visit, I told you if, after spending time doing what you want to do with other people and living on your own, you reconsider and you miss me and you think to yourself maybe you’d like to reconnect – I told you you should let me know.
I haven’t reminded you of that for two years now because I’ve been scared the answer would still just be no, and I also don’t want to throw it in your face for fear of seeming like I’m a loser who hasn’t gotten over it and who is trying to make you feel guilty because I’m spiteful and vengeful.
I don’t know where you’re at but I figured you also don’t know where I’m at because we haven’t talked at all for a long time. My heart is still open to you because through my post-[The Ex] journey you still feel irreplaceable to me. I would like to think that these feelings would diminish over time, but they haven’t really diminished at all over two full years. I continue to think about you daily and suspect that I will for a long time. So consider this more or less an open ended invitation, if you weren’t still aware that one existed.
In the mean time I am going to continue striving to be a more humble, kind human being. I am trying to write a novel. I’m a real [job title] now . . . not a joke of a [job title] like I was when you were around. I am pursuing spiritual enlightenment – though who knows if I’ll ever find it or if it’s even a real thing to find.
I am trying really hard for my life to cease being marked – or even more strongly: defined by my losing you.
Take care, [The Ex]. I don’t really need to hope that your academic program is going well because you’ve always been a rock star and I more or less can presume that it’s going very well. I hope that you have found companionship, romantic/sexual fulfillment, and joy in your life down there. I hope [dog] is well too.
With malice toward none
I’m a pretty serious regular at my neighborhood coffee shop, and I’ve become buddies with one of the baristas there. He’s been dating someone for about a year and I’m not really acquainted with her, though I recognize her. One night a couple weeks ago he was closing and I saw her come in an hour before to hang out and await the end of his shift.
A mundane episode, I’ll admit. But I was moved, and then I was struck by how strange it was that I was so moved. As gestures of intimacy and devotion go, it was pretty minor. But set against the backdrop of the last few years during which connections slip like sand through my fingers, it was downright beautiful. And it felt (feels) acutely remote from my life right now.
The following are anecdotes regarding how my most long-lasting online dating relationships have ended. I’m not sharing them in the spirit of casting blame or settling scores or whatever. They’re not tales of injustice. And I’m not a victim. They’re just things that happened.
While breaking up with me, a woman cited as one of her reasons that I liked being “little spoon” too much. I am not making this up. She had other reasons too. But still.
I dated another woman who I always thought had beautiful eyes, and yeah, I liked looking at them. One night while lying in bed with each other, face to face, she told me “I feel like you’re trying to gaze into my soul.” She meant that was a bad thing, I guess. She broke things off a few days later.
The aforementioned Jackie and I settled quickly into a rhythm of seeing each other almost daily about two weeks after we met. A little bit after that, she asked me for advice on how to end things with the other guys she had met off OkCupid. A little bit after that, she told me she would be going home over the winter break and invited me to come visit her while she was away. A little bit after that, she preemptively brought up that she didn’t want to be exclusive and she didn’t want a relationship with anyone right now.
I didn’t go visit her over winter break.
I’m disappointed by all those endings.
I have reason to believe that each of those women drew back or pushed me away because they thought I wasn’t over it, but I’ll spare you the details.
I could tell you stories of how things ended with women I went on 3-10 dates with that’d make your head spin, but no one’s got time to hear ‘em all.
I’m not blameless and I know I’ve hurt people, too.
I could’ve grown to love a lot of individual women I met through online dating.
I want to think that.
Arguments
1. When a dog dies and its owner goes to pieces with sadness, no one would ever point to that grief as proof the owner couldn’t properly love and care for a new dog. And no one would tut-tut the owner for adopting Rex before she “got over” Fido.
2. The conventional rationale for being wary of someone who’s not “gotten over it” is the fear of what happens if the ex comes back. But no connection with anyone is perfectly secure. Everyone’s got exes orbiting them, whether they show signs of nostalgia for them or not. And there are billions of not-exes around who could lure your lover away at any time. No one’s ever truly “in the bag” and there’s no way to ensure they’ll never leave.
3. But seriously. Don’t worry – she’s not coming back.
Seeking new beginnings (still), notwithstanding
There are memories of events that definitely took place – you’re certain they happened – but those memories nevertheless become increasingly hard to trust as time goes on, just because they feel so thoroughly alien. Doubt creeps in.
One such memory of mine is of The Ex and I getting into cutesy, playful arguments over who loved the other more. I would say I loved her more, and she’d crinkle her nose and vehemently object and tap me on the face and say she loved me more, and we’d go round and round protesting to each other: nuh-uh, I love you more. This was a habitual dispute we’d get into.
When The Ex ended our relationship and I was faced with the prospect of starting over with someone else, I figured the task would be daunting, but I had a great deal of faith that a little self-improvement and a bit of earnest application would get me there reasonably quickly. I didn’t yet then appreciate how fortunate I had been to have had a multi-year, cohabitating, highly affectionate relationship with someone who was simultaneously a best friend and lover. I think I thought, at least subconsciously, that relationships like that came naturally (to the worthy, as I assumed I was) and were relatively easy to find.
Consider me now fairly disillusioned as to that particular belief.
But so what I’ve struggled with mightily is the question of why establishing something with a new partner comparable to what I had with The Ex has proven so elusive.
One thought I’ve kicked around recently is that there are lots and lots of people out there who have never experienced anything remotely like the relationship (I at least felt like) I had with The Ex.
For them, that kind of relationship doesn’t fit within any sort of template they’re familiar with. And so I’ve been dating in a state of mind where I am ready for, or even expecting, something stable and good and loving to develop, and quickly. For lots of people who’ve never had a comparable experience, something stable, good, and loving might feel weird, scary, smothering, or mundane.
No one on OkCupid answers “someone to come home to.”
With that in mind, is it possible that possessing the memory of having had something spectacular in the past is a great privilege, rather than a heavy burden? If it’s made me ready to spot what’s true and good and real when it’s on offer again from someone new, having such a memory could be an enormous asset out in a dating world where lots of folks are muddling through, totally ill-equipped to find superlative connection when it’s presented to them.
Such a realization might help me turn what’s felt like a loss without end into a steady foundation to build upon.
Here’s hoping.
To help the wayward learn how to send messages, or hell, just for the sake of sheer naked exhibitionism, I’ve posted every first message I’ve sent to women through OkCupid. There’s 221 in all, spread over the last 26 months.
Whether by dint of good fortune or through sheer force of will you happen to go on first dates with 63 strangers you met off the internet, dating is gonna drop some truth bombs on you. Some will be subtle, and others’ll hit you over the head.
Perhaps, reader, you may be wondering, “Wow, 63? Isn’t that emotionally (and financially!) draining?” You’re telling me, friend.
Here are my valedictory remarks – after 21 months I’ve learned:
That highly compatible aesthetic tastes regarding just about anything (music, food, art) tell you approximately nothing about whether you will enjoy spending time with someone.
People who entirely, 100% share your politics can still be jerks.
That there are innumerable reasons why someone may not respond to your advances online and that only some of them have to do with you. Even when they have to do with you, you were given such a small sliver of that someone’s attention that you cannot at all take it as an indictment of who you are. You just can’t.
That once you start getting kind, engaging, complimentary messages from seemingly warmhearted, decent people you are not attracted to at all, you’ll get why the nearly universal way of turning someone down in online dating is silence: engaging with those messages on a platonic level sends the wrong signal (it is a dating site after all), whereas a response that is forthright and clear in establishing you’re not interested in meeting your would-be wooer is no more fun to receive than none at all.
That you will experience a lot of firsts (& seconds, & thirds): your introductory messages will be ignored, you will be turned down for second dates, someone you date will refuse to exclusively date only you when you ask her or him to. These milestones will all hurt. Given enough time and dates they cease to be milestones and they become routine. Their being routine will strip these setbacks of their power to hurt you. The setbacks occurred – you’re still here.
That once you become inured to rejection through repetition (as opposed to intentional spiritual effort), when you no longer have any fear that you will not be desired, others will sense your equanimity and will be powerfully drawn to it. You will attract more romantic attention than you could ever realistically entertain.
There is a danger here: even when you attain a zen-like detachment from romantic loss, others are still breakable.
That the process of finding this out can rend your heart more than rejection used to, back before you were inured to it.
That equanimity being double-sided isn’t a mere matter of literal definition; that the same emotional distance that allows you to brush rejection off your shoulder with ease is in all likelihood an impassable boundary precluding true human connection.
That your friends will give you a lot of shit about how it’s wrong and deceptive to date several people at once, even if none of those several people have said anything to indicate they would object if they knew. He or she of your friends who is without romantic sin should cast the first stone. But still, they might be right.
After you date one person for a while, it will become impossible to remember how they appeared to you on the first date.
You kinda gotta wonder: how much of this increased dating success came from rigorous psychic self-improvement vs. how much can just be attributed to flossing with way more discipline and regularity than before?
That your ex, the one you lost and who you joined online dating sites to get over/transcend/replace, is not on those sites. He or she may literally be on there (and you are highly advised not to spend much time looking at or for the ex’s profile), but what I mean is a like-for-like replacement human being who looks like your ex, thinks and acts like your ex, and loves you like you fervently wished your ex still did is not. This realization is hard won. This truth is simultaneously both devastatingly sad and ok, somehow.
While adhering to the expectation that a partner should stand up and articulate what it is they desire (emotionally, sexually) can under some circumstances be a way to empower her or him and affirm his or her agency, under other circumstances that expectation can function as a self-serving rationalization for disregarding real power imbalances. That your partner may be, rightfully or wrongfully, too scared to ask for what they really want.
It is much, much easier to be the one to ask your partner “tell me what it is that you want” than it is to tell them what you want. That you shouldn’t pat yourself on the back too much for inviting someone to reveal themselves and make themselves vulnerable before you. That you should be honored if they do.
That if there’s anyone out there who isn’t kinda self-conscious and anxious the first time they sleep with a new person, I sure haven’t slept with them yet.
If you want to sound the depths of someone’s emotional seas, so to speak, you could do worse than to pay attention to his or her reactions to the gaffes or blunders that inevitably occur during sex.
That there are brilliant and thoughtful people who never went to prestigious colleges. There are vibrant, vital, creative individuals working shit jobs. The opposite of these two statements can also be true.
That contrary to popular belief, you should be most wary of dating those who are undamaged, or who have never really been sad.
A big reason people resort to hoary, unilluminating clichés (e.g., “I don’t feel a spark,” etc.) when choosing to end a relationship is because it’s goddamn hard to look someone in the eye and honestly tell them what they don’t have that you want, and to risk having it thrown back in your face, or worse: seeing someone you do care about dearly crumple in tears at the revelations.
That holding tight to generosity as a meta-level value to govern your interaction with lovers (and everybody else) – giving others the benefit of the doubt, recognizing that everyone else’s path to this exact moment has been idiosyncratic and has taken twists and turns you will never be able to comprehend the full extent of – isn’t just bleeding-heart altruistic/kind, but absolutely guides you to better choose which people are worth investing time in.
That someone who is rejecting you might be vulnerable and in need of your compassion.
That you are a complete and whole person even if any given individual doesn’t love you.
That that in you which one person sees as a flaw, the next may very well find endearing. This isn’t sappy sentimentalism – it is true; it is my lived experience.
That in online dating there are always new people to meet.
That this once seemed a consolation.
Or even: cause for celebration.
1. ASK FOR A SECOND DATE
You live on a different continent and you’ll be heading home in about 30 hours. You normally don’t ask someone out for another date during the first date, and you definitely don’t usually ask someone out for the next evening, but there’s no time to be coy! Today you had a lot of fun meeting a erudite, beautiful, and charming British woman and her friend of equal erudition, beauty, and charm.
They should correct you and tell you they’d never call themselves “British.” They’re English.
Nod.
Soon it is the end of the night. Navigate between the dangerous twin shoals of overeager romantic ambition and missed opportunity. Evade eddies of self-doubt, etc. Propose dinner tomorrow. She should say yes. Part ways. Even though this is vacation for you, it’s just another night before work for her.
Ride the tube back to your hotel.
Note: “Tewwww-b.”
Change your mind and go the opposite direction on the line headed away from your hotel. Find the way out of a faraway station, grab a bike share bike, and ride home. Do so without the benefit of Google Maps because international data roaming is more expensive than the pens at Harrods. Receive a text while biking. Feel rage when you drop your phone right here, relief when it’s not broken, and cheer when it’s a message from her. She had fun tonight and looks forward to meeting again tomorrow.
2. HOW NOT TO BE ON THE SECOND DATE YET
Arrive outside the Chancery Lane station the next day a little early. Collect yourself! You walked here quickly and your heart rate is up. An elevated heart rate is a deadly game-killer. Once collected, you should stand there for a while. Begin to doubt that you’ve arrived at the right place at all.
Consider who to ask for assistance. Choose a man in a suit smoking a cigarette.
Though this instruction is syntactically ambiguous, in real life when you actually approach this man it will be clear to you that the man is smoking the cigarette – not the suit.
The man should be pleasant and voluble. He will tell you: “yes, if someone says ‘meet me at Chancery Lane,’ they mean right outside the station,” though there is also a road named Chancery Lane a bit down thataway and to your left.
Together you two should rule out the possibility that you were meant to meet your date on the street itself.
Wait a bit more. She will emerge. Smile.
3. GO ON THE SECOND DATE
Drinks at a suitably English-y pub and dinner at a swanky vegetarian restaurant should last about three or four hours, which objectively is a substantial period of time. Subjectively the encounter should feel very brief indeed. The conversation will be effortless. It should cover many subjects and touch upon but never quite reach many others. She will hate (HATE!) the Daily Mail. There should be too much to talk about, too little time. Remember: the etymological root of “converse” is “to turn with.” Meander.
If conversation did not playfully meander and your date expressed no more than tepid distaste for the Daily Mail, you may have gone on a date with someone, but you did not go on a second date in London with Stephanie.
At one point she should want to read you a poem, but reconsider, and then re-reconsider. She will read the poem.
You will feel several different emotions. Be a bit too affected by her accent. You provincial American, you. Be afraid you won’t really “get” the poem when she begins to recite it to you. “Get” it more than you thought you would. She should stress a particular line in the poem that she loves. Try to figure out whether she stressed that one line because she loves it, or if she meant it as an invitation, or both.
Note: You won’t really ever know.
The phone she reads from should light her face in a truly spectacular way. It should move you. Ponder the Buddhist concept of impermanence while being moved. Sadden. Get over it. Finally – experience an emotion so rare you’ve never felt it before: something like gratitude toward your exes for dumping you so you could be here tonight.
The restaurant tab should be ruinously expensive. You will offer to pay and she will offer to pay. The politics/significance of who pays for dates is such a trite subject. Don’t think too much about it one way or the other.
Leave the restaurant. Walk the dark narrow lanes together. Strategize as to how you can extend the evening now that its inevitable end is appearing over the horizon. Practically invite yourself over.
Fail.
She’ll agree to let you walk her most of the way home. Go. The streets should be damp and cold and evocative, like they are in all the Romcoms you’ve seen that’ve shaped your prior conceptions of what a date in London would be like.
Note: Specifically you’re thinking of Notting Hill. You sap.
Think back to every single other time you’ve made that initial romantic physical contact. Be aware once again that the figurative term “leap of faith,” no matter how overused and cliché, is goddamn apt at moments like these.
Always remember that different bodies fit together in different ways and no two first moves will ever turn out the same. As a younger man you would have overthought this shit, but tonight you will not. Settle on putting your arm around her waist. Feel for a jacket pocket, or maybe just like a belt loop to anchor your hand. Find nothing. Even though this first move is too noncommittal to work well, she should not draw away. Be thankful.
Share. Talk. She will tell you – why not, right? – that she’s sort of seeing someone, but they’re also kind of on a break, and that the whys and hows of the break seem silly to her. They should seem silly to you too. She’ll be glad you agree.
Keep walking, with an awkward gait, waist-to-waist. She should unpack her sort-of relationship with you. While doing so, she’ll sigh. A lot. She will apologize for seeming self-centered. Agree solipsism is a trap that’s hard to escape from. Resolve to try harder in the future to break free of it. Ponder the Buddhist concept of the oneness of all beings. Intuit (or: hope) that her sighs signal more than just melancholy over her sort-of lover; that you and your pending departure have affected her. Too.
Know first hand that heartache can be multivalent.
Soon she will take your arm off from around her waist and hold your hand. That’s better. Try to calibrate how much you squeeze her hand to how much she squeezes yours.
Note: Dude you’re overthinking it.
Stop on a corner. Ask for her email address. Kiss. She should say: “Bye, [your name].” Wince imperceptibly. Say: “Bye.”
Go back to America.
4. HOW TO NOT TO HAVE A SECOND DATE IN LONDON ANYMORE
People should ask: “how was the trip?” You should tell them. People should be mildly impressed that you went on dates with a British English woman. People should ask: “how did you set that up?” Tell them: “OkCupid.” People should wonder aloud: “I didn’t know they had that over there.”
Note: It’s basically just the US with better accents. Yes: they have OkCupid.
Tell the people you had an enchanting time with her.
After some trial and error, recognize the limits of how much you can talk about Stephanie before your friends begin to smirk at you warmly with the same expression you yourself would give a five year-old who said he knows who he’s going to marry when he grows up. Feel a bit silly. Feel precious.
Struggle to construct meaning from experience. Go back to work. Welcome home.
I’ve previously discussed some of the ins and outs of “traditional” online dating, such as thoughtful profile construction, assembling an array of photographs, the right frame of mind to be in when sending out messages, and some techniques for not only selling yourself truthfully yet convincingly, but also thinking critically about what you truly might be looking for in a match.
If it sounds to you like there’s a lot of work that goes into this shit, then yeah, you’re right.
So because I’ve grown a bit weary in what’s now month fifteen of my soulmate sojourn (or whatever) I’ve started to look for easy ways out and to cut corners where I can. Tinder it is!
Like a lot of people probably did (and do), at first I thought Tinder was a pretty stupid concept. Your “profile” consists almost entirely of just a few photos of yourself. There’s no search function since the app solicits nearly no information from users that could form the basis of a search. Instead Tinder presents you with a (seemingly) limitless number of people, served up one at a time and you just say yes or no to their photographs. (“Thumbs down, he’s holding a dead deer carcass…thumbs up, he looks good in a suit…thumbs down, she’s got a kid…a vigorous thumbs up, she’s giving a liquor bottle a blowjob…”)
Now I’m increasingly convinced that the Tinder people are really on to something.
It’s not just that the people on Tinder are, on average (as you’d expect from a photo-driven service), more physically attractive, but the effort involved in setting up a traditional online dating profile is staggering. It’s particularly burdensome when you’re picking yourself up from a failed former fling. With Tinder, all you do is open an app, pick some decent photos of yourself, and begin swiping. Elegant in its simplicity. So low-commitment that seemingly vast numbers of people have signed up (or at least it seems vast when you have to swipe one by one).
A reasonable person might object: “Sure, there’s a lot of attractive people on there, but that’s not all there is to a successful match! What about the dimensions of compatibility??!?!”
I dunno man. Water seeks its own level, or whatever. So far I’ve met the same caliber of women off Tinder as I met off of other sites – professionally employed, grad degree-holding/seeking, ambitious, etc. After investing some time into getting myself a decent main profile pic and boiling down my In Search of Lost Time-length OkCupid profile down to a much shorter (I dig Margaret Atwood’s short story from that link) 30 words, I’ve been getting more intelligent, attractive women willing to meet up with me than I have evenings free to spend with them.
Lest this sound like I’m just taking the opportunity to brag, I realize the same mechanism that’s bringing these women into my life is also bringing a bunch of super hot dudes into their lives, which is to say when Tinder delivers up an unending stream of interesting, attractive people, the inescapable implication of the way it shapes my perspective on dating is that it’s doing the same for the women on the other end. I’m not breaking ground here by observing that online dating can lead to embarrassment of riches type-dilemmas, but Tinder feels like some next level shit – a hyperreal expansion of possibilities and reduction of difficulty in meeting people. Imagine a slot machine where each pull is free – all it costs is the time you spend sitting there yanking the arm. How much do you have to win before you’re willing to walk away?
The ease with which you can meet people, I think, makes it harder to recognize your endless matches as individual human beings with unique perspective and experiences – and feelings. Unless you make conscious efforts to step back from the addictive game of aimless swiping right and left in your free time, it’s seductively easy to view any single person as entirely disposable. For any reason, or no reason at all, abandon your current contacts, open the app back up and make some new matches.
FUN REAL LIFE EXAMPLE! I “matched” with Julia, 24. We exchanged a few messages about this and that and agreed to meet at a neighborhood coffee shop. Then she cancelled and we rescheduled. Then she cancelled on the day of, and we rescheduled. Then she cancelled on the day of, told me “I promise I’m not really fickle, I’m just sick,” and we rescheduled. Then she cancelled on the day of and said she did not want to reschedule.
Which, being real for a sec, is it possible for any one person to be indispensable? For any of us with a lot of options, when is good good enough? And when good is good enough, will the other person agree?
After a break up one of my good friends told me, “It sounds like [ex’s name] had a lot of really great qualities, but you’ll find other people who have great qualities. They won’t have the same qualities as [ex’s name], but they’ll be wonderful in their own ways.” And time’s proven him right – I’ve met lots of people who are extraordinary in ways I never predicted and couldn’t have guessed in advance that I’d appreciate anyhow. Women with qualities I didn’t know I’d want to look for before I met women who possessed them.
All of this is to say I’m becoming a skeptic that the concept of “what I want” is something knowable – something I can access and work off of to achieve the goal of forming something meaningful and lasting with someone. My favorite author in my favorite novel wrote that “almost nothing important that ever happens to you happens because you engineer it.” So if it’s hard enough to sift through thousands of women’s profiles to identify promising prospects if I have criteria I know are what I’m looking for, think of how adrift I am browsing through Match.com or OkCupid profiles when I’ve lost faith in my judgments about who might be a good fit for me. And what if all the other compulsive swipers out there are coming to the same realizations I’m having?
Ah well. Got another Tinder match while writing this post. Time to figure out what to say to another hot woman I know nothing about.
I’d never heard the term “DTR” before reading Maureen O’Connor’s article “How to Sneak In (Or Out) a Relationship’s Back Door” but I immediately recognized it as one of the core issues to confront when dating a bunch of people you’ve met off the internet (or through any other means).
Just like with discussions about STIs, in an ideal world we’d all sit down and have sober, earnest, forthright talks about our feelings regarding the course/path of a relationship and we could communicate our desires openly and fearlessly.
More realistically, moments where we try to “define the relationship” with someone who falls in the vast middle ground between fuck buddy and fiancée often are catalyzed by awkward social encounters (“So I noticed tonight you introduced me as your girlfriend, but…”), drunken desperation, or just irrepressible insecurity that you just can’t hold in anymore. And the protagonist in O’Connor’s article is more or less right that until you DTR, very few things are offlimits – though that doesn’t mean you won’t feel a bunch of guilt and confusion every time someone you’re dating (pre-DTR) texts to ask you what you’re up to and you hastily send a text that says “not that much, you?” during the brief interval between when your current bedmate walks off to take a postcoital bathroom pit stop and when he/she gets back.
A friend of mine asked me how things went the last time I had a DTR discussion and I’ve reproduced our discussion here:
Need help understanding all the online dating lingo? I’m here to help.
They say… But they actually mean…
So you wanna online date.
You just got dumped, or you’ve already dated all your decent looking friends’ friends, or whatever. Someone told you there’s a bunch of cool people on OkCupid or a bunch of successful people on Match.com or a bunch of people watching the minute hand on the biological clock rotate on and on on eHarmony. (Or so I imagine – never joined that one…)
If you’re looking for anything more than genitals getting creative with orifices (or vice versa), you’re gonna need to write yourself a profile and if you wanna meet someone interesting, it’s gonna have to be kinda good. And most people have no idea where to start.
Rule 1: Reflect, Reflect, Reflect
The point of a profile is to attract the kind of people you want to meet. Give this some thought! The number of people floating around on dating sites can be overwhelming and there will never be time to date them all – even if by some miracle they all wanted to date you. You might want someone who lives to work and climbs the corporate ladder with ease, you might want a political activist who wants to change the world, an artist or musician. Do you want a deep thinker who will match profundities with you all night at the coffee shop or a weightlessly hedonistic hardbody to dance with you downtown? Someone with a passport full of stamps or someone who can dress a carcass after a hunt?
You get the idea – and I’m getting sick of trying to pose examples of mutually exclusive personality types.
You don’t need to compile an entirely comprehensive list of all possible desirable traits in a mate – but you should think of some characteristics that would be high on your wishlist because the next order question is “what is the type of person I’m looking for looking for?”
Once you’ve psyched yourself out with all this self-reflection, you’re ready to start typing!
Rule 2: Don’t self-characterize
OkCupid and Match, and probably other sites, all ask you to summarize yourself. A lot of people take this too literally and write something like:
“Oh, I hate talking about myself! But my friend told me to join, so here goes: I am funny, sarcastic, quirky, open, honest, I am a hard worker, my friends would say I’m dependable. I’m a shoulder you can cry on, I love family, and I’m all around AWESOME!”
Yeah, alright.
There are a couple big problems with self-characterization like this. The first is that it’s off-putting – while online dating inherently requires a degree of self-promotion, when else would you feel comfortable asserting to strangers that you possess a bottomless supply of desirable personality traits? English 101 taught us “show, don’t tell” when writing creatively, and the same is true about profile construction. You should be able to demonstrate your sense of humor through your profile, or someone should be able to infer your commitment to earnest sincerity or personal growth from what you have to say, not just by saying it.
The other huge problem with self-characterization as a cornerstone of a profile is that it provides no common ground that someone cool could start from. Even if you’re hilarious and incredibly honest, a visitor to your profile can’t craft much of a message around that.
You can boil this down to the advice of talk about what you like instead of what you are. What’s a fun weekend to you? What do you want to accomplish in life? What values do you hold dear? Which brings us to…
Rule 3: Be specific
There’s a prompt on OkCupid that’s called “the six things I could never do without.”
Some make a pretty lame stab at being funny and answer literally (“1. water, 2. food, 3. air..”), but nearly everyone else answers with a near total lack of imagination. Countless people answer with “family,” or “the internet,” or “my iphone,” or “coffee.”
I guess if you want to cast a net wide, you’re not gonna alienate anyone by saying you like your family or coffee, but it’s not gonna help you connect with anyone that actually may share some real, deep-level compatibility with you.
You should take some risks in your profile and try and identify parts of you that are controversial – issues/values/choices/lifestyles that not everyone shares. If you have interests a lot of people profess, take it a step further. Everyone in the world (if online dating profiles are any guide) loves “travel,” but does travel mean taking an RV to Mount Rushmore, pub hopping in Dublin, taking ecstasy at a beach rave in Thailand, doing missionary work in Uganda, or what? (I have a near 100% response and subsequent date rate of return when messaging with women who have been to the same countries I’ve been to)
You gotta strike a balance, though, and make sure to remind yourself of the question “will this help someone identify/connect with me?”
For a good example of pointless specificity, look to the profile of any dude who holds forth on the finer points of his taste in beer:
“I like my IPAs hoppy, but I also tend toward the Belgians, but lately I’ve been enjoying the subtlety of a good pilsner.”
Lots of dudes seem to think this crap is important. Have a lot of successful marriages been based upon the cornerstone of shared opinions about beer? I doubt it.
Rule 4: Play to your strengths (sincerely)
After 10 months of online dating I’ve safely come to the conclusion that the most three valuable words in my profile are “I am feminist.” Woman after woman has either commented on that during the messaging process, or has later revealed that that was one of the big reasons they chose to meet me.
That said, I am feminist, and it’d be a pretty bad idea to strike that pose if you couldn’t back it up. Being acquainted with a number (more than one!) of people who are working on or have completed PhDs in feminist theory, I can string together a sentence or two if someone asks me what I mean. And I mean it!
A lot of people are bashful about hyping themselves up – but this is online dating and everyone knows you need to self-promote yourself a little bit. Do some bragging – if you have accomplishments it’s fine to share them. If you’ve cultivated refined interests/knowledge show that off too (within reason).
Think of what makes you distinctive and valuable – and make sure that comes out in your profile.
These ideas are a basic primer. Profile construction is a tricky hit-or-miss process. Hope these ideas have been helpful to you as you get started.
As of yesterday I’ve now met 34 women off the internet since December 2012.
Though it’s possible to overthink things and see patterns where none exist, there’s two kinda counterintuitive conclusions I’ve drawn from my experiences.
One is that I have struck out with every woman who I’ve met for a first date that I initially found highly attractive, and the other is that the women I’ve ultimately found most compelling and affecting – Kristina, Elle, Rachael, Kyla – are women who I wasn’t initially sure I was that physically attracted to. Those four caused me way more heartache than the beautiful women I met and missed out on after merely one date.
Let’s talk about the first phenomenon: the women who were stunning at first glance who never end up liking me. Regrettably that’s happened to me at least five or six times. The simplest explanation for this would just be that maybe the super hot women have really high standards and that I didn’t measure up to their expectations. I’m sure this was true to an extent for some of them, but I don’t think it’s fully persuasive because my profile had and has a lot of pictures of me, including both facial closeups and full body shots. If I wasn’t even in the ballpark of attractiveness for them, presumably they wouldn’t have agreed to meet in the first place. (First time users may make the mistake of rolling the dice by agreeing to meet people who are “maybes” from a physical perspective, but I get the distinct sense from my own experience and talking to power-dating friends that just about everyone who’s taken a couple laps around the internet love block gets more and more particular about risking their precious dating energies on people that may show up looking closer in proximity to negative numbers than double digits on the ol’ 10 point scale, if they (the lap-takers) can possibly help it.)
At first I responded to setbacks with the hyperbeautiful by trying to hit the gym, improving my wardrobe, and reflecting upon the style of hair on my head or on my face. Now though, I think addressing the issue is trickier than just getting to be the hottest I could possibly be.
I’m convinced now that I unwittingly treat women I’m really attracted to in ways that make me unappealing. In The Pale King, David Foster Wallace described the effect a beautiful woman had on the men around her and his analysis rings true – that extreme beauty “raises the stakes” and makes it hard to be yourself, be engaging, just be human to the person you’re meeting. This is, of course, super self-defeating.
Without question I did this on the date I had with Grace, the first women I met off the internet. In her profile pictures she’d been heart-rendingly pretty and she lived up to that description in the flesh. Carried away with my own good fortune and desire to impress, I talked a mile a minute and told her about a wide variety of the many facets of the gem that is my personality and as you can imagine, I came off as needy and self-absorbed – a combination few people hammer out on the keyboard in response to the “What I’m Looking For:” prompt on the dating sites.
Conversely, the four women I’ve met out of 34 that I feel most fondly toward – each of whom I’d jump at the chance to date again – all were cute but not initially incredibly gorgeous to me. My first date with Kristina lasted 6 hours of unbroken conversation in one coffee shop, Elle 17 hours at four different locations followed by spending the night at her place, Rachael 8 hours that concluded when we made out in front of her house, and Kyla 5 hours, three of which consisted of sitting on one park bench sharing pretty intimate confidences about love and loss. And all agreed to second dates. Though ironically, it’s only now in retrospect that my desire for each of them is strong. At the time I was up for a second date, but I wasn’t gunning hard to get with any of them.
I was hoping that the process of writing this post would shed some light on how to succeed in dating people you’re really interested in, but I don’t think I’ve succeeded. Since the realization that how I behave around powerfully attractive women makes me less likely to connect with them, I’ve tried to harness that knowledge and adjust my attitude when I find myself getting carried away, but thinking to myself “don’t think of how hot this person is” ends up tending to psyche me out rather than bolster the self-assured well-adjusted demeanor that would be truly beneficial.
Oh well.